On the observability of T Tauri accretion shocks in the X-ray band
G. G. Sacco, S. Orlando, C. Argiroffi, A. Maggio, G. Peres, F. Reale,, R. L. Curran

TL;DR
This study models the impact of accretion streams on T Tauri stars to assess the X-ray observability of shock-heated plasma, revealing that absorption biases X-ray detection towards low-density, high-velocity streams and explaining observational discrepancies.
Contribution
We developed a 1-D hydrodynamic model including radiative cooling, gravity, and thermal conduction to analyze X-ray emission from accretion shocks in T Tauri stars, highlighting absorption effects.
Findings
X-ray detection favors low-density, high-velocity shocks due to absorption.
Post-shock zones show quasi-periodic oscillations, but often undetectable in inhomogeneous streams.
Absorption effects may explain differences in accretion rate measurements across wavelengths.
Abstract
Context. High resolution X-ray observations of classical T Tauri stars (CTTSs) show a soft X-ray excess due to high density plasma (n_e=10^11-10^13 cm^-3). This emission has been attributed to shock-heated accreting material impacting onto the stellar surface. Aims. We investigate the observability of the shock-heated accreting material in the X-ray band as a function of the accretion stream properties (velocity, density, and metal abundance) in the case of plasma-beta<<1 in the post-shock zone. Methods. We use a 1-D hydrodynamic model describing the impact of an accretion stream onto the chromosphere, including the effects of radiative cooling, gravity and thermal conduction. We explore the space of relevant parameters and synthesize from the model results the X-ray emission in the [0.5-8.0] keV band and in the resonance lines of O VII (21.60 Ang) and Ne IX (13.45 Ang), taking into…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
