On the mass-radius relation of hot stellar systems
Mark Gieles (1,2,3), Holger Baumgardt (4,5), Douglas Heggie (2), Henny, Lamers (6) ((1) Cambridge, (2) Edinburgh, (3) ESO, (4) Bonn, (5) Brisbane,, (6) Utrecht)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the mass-radius relation of hot stellar systems, revealing a break at ~10^6 solar masses due to stellar evolution and binary interactions, and suggests a common initial formation relation for all such systems.
Contribution
It demonstrates that globular clusters' current properties result from balanced stellar and dynamical evolution, obscuring their initial mass-radius relation.
Findings
Globular clusters have a mass-radius relation independent of initial conditions.
A break in the relation occurs at ~10^6 solar masses due to stellar evolution effects.
All hot stellar systems likely formed with a similar initial mass-radius relation.
Abstract
Most globular clusters have half-mass radii of a few pc with no apparent correlation with their masses. This is different from elliptical galaxies, for which the Faber-Jackson relation suggests a strong positive correlation between mass and radius. Objects that are somewhat in between globular clusters and low-mass galaxies, such as ultra-compact dwarf galaxies, have a mass-radius relation consistent with the extension of the relation for bright ellipticals. Here we show that at an age of 10 Gyr a break in the mass-radius relation at ~10^6 Msun is established because objects below this mass, i.e. globular clusters, have undergone expansion driven by stellar evolution and hard binaries. From numerical simulations we find that the combined energy production of these two effects in the core comes into balance with the flux of energy that is conducted across the half-mass radius by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
