Quantum computation and hidden variables
V.V. Aristov, A.V. Nikulov

TL;DR
This paper critiques the instrumentalist view of quantum mechanics, emphasizing the importance of hidden variables and foundational questions to understand quantum computation and the nature of quantum systems.
Contribution
It clarifies Bell's theorem limitations, argues for the potential of hidden variables in two-state systems, and questions assumptions about superposition and quantum bits.
Findings
Bell's theorem limits are narrower than often assumed.
Two-state systems can be described by hidden variables.
No experimental evidence confirms superposition in macroscopic states.
Abstract
Many physicists limit oneself to an instrumentalist description of quantum phenomena and ignore the problems of foundation and interpretation of quantum mechanics. This instrumentalist approach results to "specialization barbarism" and mass delusion concerning the problem, how a quantum computer can be made. The idea of quantum computation can be described within the limits of quantum formalism. But in order to understand how this idea can be put into practice one should realize the question: "What could the quantum formalism describe?", in spite of the absence of an universally recognized answer. Only a realization of this question and the undecided problem of quantum foundations allows to see in which quantum systems the superposition and EPR correlation could be expected. Because of the "specialization barbarism" many authors are sure that Bell proved full impossibility of any…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
