Comment on "Feshbach-Einstein Condensates" by V. G. Rousseau and P. J. H. Denteneer
Mar\'ia Eckholt, Tommaso Roscilde

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous claim of a novel super-Mott phase in an atom-molecule Bose-Hubbard model, demonstrating that the phase was misinterpreted due to flawed estimators, and concludes it is actually a normal insulator.
Contribution
The paper clarifies the limitations of superfluidity estimators in the presence of atom-molecule conversion, correcting the interpretation of the phase diagram in the prior study.
Findings
The super-Mott phase is a misinterpretation due to estimator breakdown.
The phase is actually a normal insulator.
Superfluidity estimators fail with coherent atom-molecule conversion.
Abstract
In a recent paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 015301 (2009), arXiv:0810.3763) Rousseau and Denteneer claim that an unconventional "super-Mott" (SM) phase is realized by bosons trapped in an optical lattice close to a Feshbach resonance with a molecular state. The supposed SM phase, observed via quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations of an atom-molecule Bose-Hubbard model, is an incompressible phase developing spontaneous atomic/molecular supercurrents which are perfectly anticorrelated. Here we show that the identification of this phase is based on a misinterpretation of the estimators of superfluidity in QMC, which break down in the presence of coherent atom/molecule conversion. Our conclusion is that the supposed SM phase is in fact a fully normal insulator.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
