The contribution of AGN to the sub-mm population
Michael D. Hill, Tom Shanks

TL;DR
This study shows that faint, absorbed X-ray sources are significant contributors to the sub-mm background, supporting models where obscured AGN play a key role in the cosmic X-ray and sub-mm backgrounds.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence linking faint, absorbed X-ray sources to sub-mm emission, supporting non-unified AGN models and estimating their contribution to the sub-mm background.
Findings
Faint, absorbed X-ray sources are significant sub-mm emitters.
X-ray sources contribute about 3% to the sub-mm background.
Including Compton-thick, X-ray-undetected sources raises AGN contribution to 25-40%.
Abstract
We find that X-ray sources in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South are strongly spatially correlated with LABOCA 870 micron sources. We investigate the dependence of this correlation on X-ray flux, hardness ratio and column density, finding that specifically faint and absorbed X-ray sources are significant sub-mm emitters. In the X-ray source redshift subsample we confirm the previous result that higher luminosity sources (L_X>10^44 ergs/s) have greater 870um fluxes but we also find that this subsample selects against absorbed sources, faint in X-ray flux. Overall, we find that X-ray sources contribute 1.5 \pm 0.1 Jy/deg^2 to the sub-mm background, ~3% of the total, in agreement with the prediction of an obscured AGN model which also gives a reasonable fit to the bright sub-mm source counts. This non-unified model also suggests that when Compton-thick, X-ray-undetected sources are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
