The Formation of Massive Cluster Galaxies
Conor L. Mancone, Anthony H. Gonzalez, Mark Brodwin, Spencer A., Stanford, Peter R. M. Eisenhardt, Daniel Stern, and Christine Jones

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of massive cluster galaxies using infrared luminosity functions from z=0.3 to 2, finding evidence for passive evolution at lower redshifts and ongoing mass assembly at higher redshifts.
Contribution
It provides new constraints on the formation epoch of massive cluster galaxies and investigates systematic biases affecting luminosity function measurements.
Findings
Passive evolution consistent with zf=2.4 at z<1.3
Evidence for ongoing mass assembly at z>1.3
Systematic uncertainties quantified for formation redshift estimates
Abstract
We present composite 3.6 and 4.5 micron luminosity functions for cluster galaxies measured from the Spitzer Deep, Wide-Field Survey (SDWFS) for 0.3<z<2. We compare the evolution of m* for these luminosity functions to models for passively evolving stellar populations to constrain the primary epoch of star formation in massive cluster galaxies. At low redshifts (z < 1.3) our results agree well with models with no mass assembly and passively evolving stellar populations with a luminosity-weighted mean formation redshift zf=2.4 assuming a Kroupa initial mass function (IMF). We conduct a thorough investigation of systematic biases that might influence our results, and estimate systematic uncertainites of Delta zf=(+0.16-0.18) (model normalization), Delta zf=(+0.40-0.05) (alpha), and Delta zf=(+0.30-0.45) (choice of stellar population model). For a Salpeter type IMF, the typical formation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
