Mass loss rates and the mass evolution of star clusters
Henny J.G.L.M. Lamers, Holger Baumgardt, Mark Gieles

TL;DR
This paper models the complex interplay of stellar evolution and dynamical processes affecting star cluster mass loss, providing a predictive recipe for their mass evolution across different environments and initial conditions.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive framework combining stellar evolution and dynamical effects, with a simple power-law model for relaxation-driven mass loss and formulas for different initial cluster states.
Findings
Mass loss by stellar evolution and relaxation-driven processes are quantitatively characterized.
A power-law dependence describes the relaxation-driven mass loss with parameters depending on cluster properties.
The model predicts cluster mass evolution with a few percent accuracy across various conditions.
Abstract
We describe the interplay between stellar evolution and dynamical mass loss of evolving star clusters, based on the principles of stellar evolution and cluster dynamics and on a grid of N-body simulations of cluster models. The cluster models have different initial masses, different orbits, including elliptical ones, and different initial density profiles. We use two sets of cluster models: initially Roche-lobe filling and Roche-lobe underfilling. We identify four distinct mass loss effects: (1) mass loss by stellar evolution, (2) loss of stars induced by stellar evolution and (3) relaxation-driven mass loss before and (4) after core collapse. Both the evolution-induced loss of stars and the relaxation-driven mass loss need time to build up. This is described by a delay-function of a few crossing times for Roche-lobe filling clusters and a few half mass relaxation times for Roche-lobe…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
