Canonical-basis time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov theory and linear-response calculations
Shuichiro Ebata (1, 2), Takashi Nakatsukasa (1, 2), Tsunenori, Inakura (1), Kenichi Yoshida (1), Yukio Hashimoto (2), Kazuhiro Yabana (1 and, 2) ((1) RIKEN Nishina Center, (2) University of Tsukuba)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simplified canonical-basis formulation of the time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov theory, reducing computational costs and enabling accurate linear-response calculations for light nuclei.
Contribution
The authors develop a new canonical-basis approach to TDHFB that simplifies equations by assuming a diagonal pair potential, improving computational efficiency for nuclear response studies.
Findings
Accurate E1 strength distributions for Ne and Mg isotopes.
Systematic analysis of pygmy strength evolution with nuclear properties.
Validation against quasi-particle RPA calculations.
Abstract
We present simple equations for a canonical-basis formulation of the time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (TDHFB) theory. The equations are obtained from the TDHFB theory with an approximation that the pair potential is assumed to be diagonal in the canonical basis. The canonical-basis formulation significantly reduces the computational cost. We apply the method to linear-response calculations for even-even light nuclei and demonstrate its capability and accuracy by comparing our results with recent calculations of the quasi-particle random-phase approximation with Skyrme functionals. We show systematic studies of E1 strength distributions for Ne and Mg isotopes. The evolution of the low-lying pygmy strength seems to be determined by the interplay of several factors, including the neutron excess, separation energy, neutron shell effects, deformation, and pairing.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
