Is Quantum Field Theory ontologically interpretable? On localization, particles and fields in relativistic Quantum Theory
David Philip Schroeren

TL;DR
This paper investigates the ontological interpretability of quantum field theory, analyzing localization schemes, the concept of particles, and their emergence from fields within a formal and conceptual framework.
Contribution
It introduces a formal criterion for particle admitance in quantum field theories and evaluates localization concepts, highlighting the emergent nature of particles from fields.
Findings
Naive localization fails due to Reeh-Schlieder theorem
Newton-Wigner localization violates microcausality
Particles are emergent phenomena from relativistic fields
Abstract
In this paper, I provide a formal set of assumptions and give a natural criterion for a quantum field theory to admit particles. I construct a na\"ive approach to localization for a free bosonic quantum field theory and show how this localization scheme, as a consequence of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem, fails to satisfy this criterion. I then examine the Newton-Wigner concept of localization and show that it fails to obey strong microcausality and thus is subject to a more general version of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem. I review approaches to quantum field theoretic explanations of particle detection events and explain how particles can be regarded as emergent phenomena of a relativistic field theory. In particular, I show that effective localization of Hilbert space vectors is equivalent to an approximate locality of observable algebras.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Quantum Information and Cryptography
