How higher-spin gravity surpasses the spin two barrier: no-go theorems versus yes-go examples
Xavier Bekaert, Nicolas Boulanger, Per Sundell

TL;DR
This paper explains the mechanisms of higher-spin gravity, reviews no-go theorems and positive results, and discusses how higher-spin symmetry can be compatible with the equivalence principle in curved backgrounds.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of no-go theorems and positive results in higher-spin gravity, highlighting how higher-spin symmetry can be integrated with the equivalence principle.
Findings
No-go theorems restrict massless higher-spin interactions in flat spacetime.
Positive cubic higher-derivative vertices exist in curved backgrounds.
Higher-spin gravity can reconcile with the equivalence principle via Fradkin--Vasiliev vertices.
Abstract
Aiming at non-experts, we explain the key mechanisms of higher-spin extensions of ordinary gravity. We first overview various no-go theorems for low-energy scattering of massless particles in flat spacetime. In doing so we dress a dictionary between the S-matrix and the Lagrangian approaches, exhibiting their relative advantages and weaknesses, after which we high-light potential loop-holes for non-trivial massless dynamics. We then review positive yes-go results for non-abelian cubic higher-derivative vertices in constantly curved backgrounds. Finally we outline how higher-spin symmetry can be reconciled with the equivalence principle in the presence of a cosmological constant leading to the Fradkin--Vasiliev vertices and Vasiliev's higher-spin gravity with its double perturbative expansion (in terms of numbers of fields and derivatives).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
