Detailed abundances of a large sample of giant stars in M 54 and in the Sagittarius nucleus

TL;DR

This study provides detailed chemical abundances for stars in M54 and the Sagittarius nucleus, revealing metallicity dispersions, unique element correlations, and insights into their formation and evolutionary histories.

Contribution

It offers the first homogeneous abundance analysis of a large sample of stars in M54 and the Sgr nucleus, highlighting differences in chemical patterns and their implications for cluster formation.

Findings

M54 shows a metallicity spread similar to omega Cen.

Na-O anticorrelation is present in M54 but absent in Sgr nucleus.

Distinct element correlation patterns suggest different star formation histories.

Abstract

Homogeneous abundances of light elements, alpha and Fe-group elements from high-resolution FLAMES spectra are presented for 76 red giant stars in M54, a massive globular cluster (GC) lying in the nucleus of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy. We also derived detailed abundances for 27 red giants belonging to the Sgr nucleus. Our abundances assess the intrinsic metallicity dispersion (~0.19 dex, rms scatter) of M54, with the bulk of stars peaking at [Fe/H]~-1.6 and a long tail extending to higher metallicities, similar to omega Cen. The spread in these probable nuclear star clusters exceeds those of most GCs: these massive clusters are located in a region intermediate between normal GCs and dwarf galaxies. M54 shows the Na-O anticorrelation, typical signature of GCs, which is instead absent in the Sgr nucleus. The light elements (Mg, Al, Si) participating to the high temperature Mg-Al cycle show that the pattern of (anti)correlations produced by proton-capture reactions in H-burning is clearly different between the most metal-rich and most metal-poor components in the two most massive GCs in the Galaxy, confirming early result based on the Na-O anticorrelation. As in omega Cen, stars affected by most extreme processing, i.e. showing the signature of more massive polluters, are those of the metal-rich component. This can be understood if the burst of star formation giving birth to the metal-rich component was delayed by as much as 10-30 Myr with respect to the metal-poor one. The evolution of these massive GCs can be reconciled in the general scenario for the formation of GCs sketched in Carretta et al.(2010a) taking into account that omega Cen could have already incorporated the surrounding nucleus of its progenitor and lost the rest of the hosting galaxy while the two are still observable as distinct components in M54 and the surrounding field.