Could nanostructure be unspeakable quantum system?
V.V. Aristov, A.V. Nikulov

TL;DR
This paper explores whether nanostructures can serve as a boundary where realistic descriptions of phenomena, including quantum effects, remain valid, bridging the gap between quantum and classical physics.
Contribution
It proposes that nanostructures might define the limit of realistic description in quantum phenomena, challenging the traditional divide between quantum and macroscopic worlds.
Findings
Nanostructures could mark the boundary of realistic descriptions.
Quantum phenomena are consistent with classical realism at the nanoscale.
The boundary of realism may be extended to include nanostructures.
Abstract
Heisenberg, Bohr and others were forced to renounce on the description of the objective reality as the aim of physics because of the paradoxical quantum phenomena observed on the atomic level. The contemporary quantum mechanics created on the base of their positivism point of view must divide the world into speakable apparatus which amplifies microscopic events to macroscopic consequences and unspeakable quantum system. Examination of the quantum phenomena corroborates the confidence expressed by creators of quantum theory that the renunciation of realism should not apply on our everyday macroscopic world. Nanostructures may be considered for the present as a boundary of realistic description for all phenomena including the quantum one.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
