Approximating the Tutte polynomial of a binary matroid and other related combinatorial polynomials
Leslie Ann Goldberg, Mark Jerrum

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of approximating the Tutte polynomial for binary matroids, revealing significant inapproximability results that extend known hardness from graph cases to more general combinatorial structures.
Contribution
The authors extend inapproximability results for the Tutte polynomial from graphs to binary matroids, establishing new hardness bounds and connecting to the complexity of binary linear codes.
Findings
No FPRAS exists for gamma<-2 unless NP=RP.
Approximation is hard for #RHPi_1 in gamma>0 region.
Approximating the cycle index polynomial of permutation groups is #RHPi_1-hard.
Abstract
We consider the problem of approximating certain combinatorial polynomials. First, we consider the problem of approximating the Tutte polynomial of a binary matroid with parameters q>= 2 and gamma. (Relative to the classical (x,y) parameterisation, q=(x-1)(y-1) and gamma=y-1.) A graph is a special case of a binary matroid, so earlier work by the authors shows inapproximability (subject to certain complexity assumptions) for q>2, apart from the trivial case gamma=0. The situation for q=2 is different. Previous results for graphs imply inapproximability in the region -2<=gamma<0, apart from at two "special points" where the polynomial can be computed exactly in polynomial time. For binary matroids, we extend this result by showing (i) there is no FPRAS in the region gamma<-2 unless NP=RP, and (ii) in the region gamma>0, the approximation problem is hard for the complexity class #RHPi_1…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
