Comment on "Two-spinon and four-spinon continuum in a frustrated ferromagnetic spin-1/2 chain" by M. Enderle et al
S.-L. Drechsler, S. Nishimoto, R. Kuzian, J. Malek, W.E.A. Lorenz, J., Richter, J. van den Brink, M. Schmitt, and H. Rosner

TL;DR
This paper challenges previous interpretations of LiVCuO4's magnetic interactions, showing it is better described by strongly ferromagnetically coupled chains, with implications for understanding quantum spin states.
Contribution
The study provides a revised model for LiVCuO4's magnetic interactions, demonstrating strong in-chain frustration and contrasting with earlier weakly coupled chain descriptions.
Findings
LiVCuO4 is described by strongly ferromagnetically coupled Heisenberg chains.
Spectral density above 10 meV is due to a 4-spinon continuum.
Exact diagonalization and DMRG support strong in-chain frustration.
Abstract
We show that LiVCuO4 should be described by strongly ferromagnetically coupled Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chains (HAC) in sharp contrast with the effective exchange integrals Ji given in Enderle et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 104, 237207 (2010), and the main issues of that work, namely, (i) LiVCuO4 is well described by two weakly ferromagnetically coupled interpenetrating Heisenberg antiferromagnetic spin-1/2 chains, (ii) the extracted exchange integrals J1, J2 agree with a previous spin-wave description (Enderle et al., Euphys. Lett. vol. 70, 237 (2005)), (iii) the spectral density of inelastic neutron scattering (INS) above 10 meV is ascribed to a 4-spinon continuum. Applying exact diagonalization and DMRG methods to fit their INS and magnetization M(H) data, supported by two independent microscopic methods (5-band Hubbard model and LSDA+U calculations), we demonstrate that LiCuVO4…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
