Nearby Supernova Rates from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search. III. The Rate-Size Relation, and the Rates as a Function of Galaxy Hubble Type and Colour
Weidong Li (1), Ryan Chornock (1,2), Jesse Leaman (1,3), Alexei V., Filippenko (1), Dovi Poznanski (1), Xiaofeng Wang (1,4,5), Mohan, Ganeshalingam (1), Filippo Mannucci (6) ((1) UC Berkeley (2) CfA, Harvard (3), NASA/Ames (4) Texas A&M (5) THCA, Tsinghua University, China (6)

TL;DR
This paper presents new measurements of supernova rates in the local universe, revealing a rate-size relation where smaller galaxies have higher supernova rates per unit mass or luminosity, and discusses implications for different supernova types.
Contribution
It introduces the rate-size relation for supernovae, showing the need for a secondary parameter beyond galaxy type or color to explain supernova rates.
Findings
Smaller galaxies exhibit higher supernova rates per unit mass or luminosity.
Supernova rates are consistent across different measurement methods within uncertainties.
A possible link between core-collapse supernova rates and galaxy star-formation activity is discussed.
Abstract
This is the third paper of a series in which we present new measurements of the observed rates of supernovae (SNe) in the local Universe, determined from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search (LOSS). We have considered a sample of about 1000 SNe and used an optimal subsample of 726 SNe (274 SNe Ia, 116 SNe Ibc, and 324 SNe II) to determine our rates. We study the trend of the rates as a function of a few quantities available for our galaxy sample, such as luminosity in the B and K bands, stellar mass, and morphological class. We discuss different choices (SN samples, input SN luminosity functions, inclination correction factors) and their effect on the rates and their uncertainties. A comparison between our SN rates and the published measurements shows that they are consistent with each other to within uncertainties when the rate calculations are done in the same manner. Nevertheless,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
