Nearby Supernova Rates from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search. II. The Observed Luminosity Functions and Fractions of Supernovae in a Complete Sample
Weidong Li (1), Jesse Leaman (1,2), Ryan Chornock (1,3), Alexei V., Filippenko (1), Dovi Poznanski (1), Mohan Ganeshalingam (1), Xiaofeng Wang, (1,4,5), Maryam Modjaz (1,6), Saurabh Jha (1,7), Ryan J. Foley (1,3,8),, Nathan Smith (1) ((1) UC Berkeley (2) NASA/Ames (3) CfA

TL;DR
This study presents detailed luminosity functions and subclass fractions of nearby supernovae from a complete, volume-limited sample, addressing previous issues related to luminosity distribution and host-galaxy extinction in rate calculations.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive luminosity functions and subclass fractions for a complete local supernova sample, accounting for host-galaxy extinction and observational biases.
Findings
Luminosity functions are not Gaussian and vary by galaxy type.
Significant fractions of SNe II-L (10%), IIb (12%), and IIn (9%) were found.
Luminosity functions are more standard at high luminosities and with shorter observation intervals.
Abstract
This is the second paper of a series in which we present new measurements of the observed rates of supernovae (SNe) in the local Universe, determined from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search (LOSS). In this paper, a complete SN sample is constructed, and the observed (uncorrected for host-galaxy extinction) luminosity functions (LFs) of SNe are derived. These LFs solve two issues that have plagued previous rate calculations for nearby SNe: the luminosity distribution of SNe and the host-galaxy extinction. We select a volume-limited sample of 175 SNe, collect photometry for every object, and fit a family of light curves to constrain the peak magnitudes and light-curve shapes. The volume-limited LFs show that they are not well represented by a Gaussian distribution. There are notable differences in the LFs for galaxies of different Hubble types (especially for SNe Ia). We derive the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
