Rigid actions need not be strongly ergodic
Adrian Ioana, Stefaan Vaes

TL;DR
This paper constructs examples of ergodic, free, measure-preserving actions that are rigid but not strongly ergodic, illustrating nuanced properties of such actions and their quotients.
Contribution
It provides the first known examples of rigid actions that are ergodic but not strongly ergodic, and shows rigid actions can have non-rigid quotients.
Findings
Existence of rigid, ergodic, free actions that are not strongly ergodic
Rigid actions can have non-rigid quotients
Examples demonstrate nuanced properties of rigidity in measure-preserving actions
Abstract
A probability measure preserving action of \Gamma on (X,\mu) is called rigid if the inclusion of L^\infty(X) into the crossed product L^\infty(X) \rtimes \Gamma has the relative property (T) in the sense of Popa. We give examples of rigid, free, probability measure preserving actions that are ergodic but not strongly ergodic. The same examples show that rigid actions may admit non-rigid quotients.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Functional Equations Stability Results
