Searching for differences in Swift's intermediate GRBs

TL;DR

This study analyzes Swift's intermediate gamma-ray bursts, revealing they are less energetic and dimmer than long bursts, with properties suggesting they are a distinct class possibly due to differences in ejecta shell thickness.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed characterization of Swift's intermediate GRBs, highlighting their similarities and differences with long and short bursts, and proposing a physical model based on shell thickness.

Findings

Intermediate bursts are less energetic than long bursts.

They have dimmer X-ray afterglows and are closer in redshift.

They follow the Epeak vs. Eiso correlation similar to long bursts.

Abstract

Gamma-ray bursts are usually classified through their high-energy emission into short-duration and long-duration bursts, which presumably reflect two different types of progenitors. However, it has been shown on statistical grounds that a third, intermediate population is needed in this classification scheme, although an extensive study of the properties of this class has so far not been done. The large amount of follow-up studies generated during the Swift era allows us to have a suficient sample to attempt a study of this third population through the properties of their prompt emission and their afterglows. Our study is focused on a sample of GRBs observed by Swift during its first four years of operation. The sample contains those bursts with measured redshift since this allows us to derive intrinsic properties. Intermediate bursts are less energetic and have dimmer afterglows than long GRBs, especially when considering the X-ray light curves, which are on average one order of magnitude fainter than long bursts. There is a less significant trend in the redshift distribution that places intermediate bursts closer than long bursts. Except for this, intermediate bursts show similar properties to long bursts. In particular, they follow the Epeak vs. Eiso correlation and have, on average, positive spectral lags with a distribution similar to that of long bursts. Like long GRBs, they normally have an associated supernova, although some intermediate bursts have shown no supernova component. This study shows that intermediate bursts are different from short bursts and, in spite of sharing many properties with long bursts, there are some differences between them as well. We suggest that the physical difference between intermediate and long bursts could be that for the first the ejecta are thin shells while for the latter they are thick shells.