Reconciling the analytic QCD with the ITEP operator product expansion philosophy
Gorazd Cvetic, Reinhart Koegerler, Cristian Valenzuela

TL;DR
This paper explores whether analytic QCD models can be constructed to align with the ITEP-OPE philosophy, ensuring nonperturbative effects originate from IR regimes while accurately describing both high- and low-energy QCD observables.
Contribution
The paper investigates the possibility of developing analytic QCD models that comply with the ITEP-OPE philosophy and accurately reproduce a wide range of QCD phenomena.
Findings
Analytic QCD models can be aligned with ITEP-OPE principles.
Constructed models successfully describe semihadronic tau decay ratio.
Models reproduce high-energy QCD observables.
Abstract
Analytic QCD models are those versions of QCD in which the running coupling parameter a(Q^2) has the same analytic properties as the spacelike physical quantities, i.e., no singularities in the complex Q^2 plane except on the timelike semiaxis. In such models, a(Q^2) usually differs from its perturbative analog by power terms ~(Lambda^2/Q^2)^k for large momenta, introducing thus nonperturbative terms in spacelike physical quantities whose origin is the UV regime. Consequently, it contradicts the ITEP-OPE philosophy which states that such terms can come only from the IR regimes. We investigate whether it is possible to construct analytic QCD models which respect the ITEP-OPE philosophy and, at the same time, reproduce not just the high-energy QCD observables, but also the low-energy ones, among them the well-measured semihadronic tau decay ratio.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
