On the Evolution of the Velocity-Mass-Size Relations of Disk-Dominated Galaxies over the Past 10 Billion Years
Aaron A. Dutton (Victoria, UCO/Lick), Frank C. van den Bosch (Utah,, Yale), S. M. Faber (UCO/Lick), Luc Simard (HIA), Susan A. Kassin (Oxford),, David C. Koo (UCO/Lick), Kevin Bundy (Berkeley), Jiasheng Huang (SAO),, Benjamin J. Weiner (Steward), Michael C. Cooper (Arizona)

TL;DR
This study investigates the evolution of key scaling relations in star-forming disk galaxies over the past 10 billion years, showing weak evolution consistent with galaxy formation models and correcting previous size measurement misconceptions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis combining observational data and models to explain the evolution of galaxy scaling relations and addresses discrepancies in high-redshift galaxy size measurements.
Findings
Weak evolution of stellar and baryonic scaling relations from z~2 to 0.
Model predictions align with observed weak evolution of galaxy properties.
Corrected size measurements negate the need for high spin parameter hypotheses at high redshift.
Abstract
We study the evolution of the scaling relations between maximum circular velocity, stellar mass and optical half-light radius of star-forming disk-dominated galaxies in the context of LCDM-based galaxy formation models. Using data from the literature combined with new data from the DEEP2 and AEGIS surveys we show that there is a consistent observational and theoretical picture for the evolution of these scaling relations from z\sim 2 to z=0. The evolution of the observed stellar scaling relations is weaker than that of the virial scaling relations of dark matter haloes, which can be reproduced, both qualitatively and quantitatively, with a simple, cosmologically-motivated model for disk evolution inside growing NFW dark matter haloes. In this model optical half-light radii are smaller, both at fixed stellar mass and maximum circular velocity, at higher redshifts. This model also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
