Designing a space-based galaxy redshift survey to probe dark energy
Yun Wang, Will Percival, Andrea Cimatti, Pia Mukherjee, Luigi Guzzo,, Carlton M. Baugh, Carmelita Carbone, Paolo Franzetti, Bianca Garilli, James, E. Geach, Cedric G. Lacey, Elisabetta Majerotto, Alvaro Orsi, Piero Rosati,, Lado Samushia, Giovanni Zamorani

TL;DR
A space-based galaxy redshift survey optimized for parameters like redshift accuracy and range can significantly improve dark energy constraints, especially when including growth rate data, and is feasible with current technology.
Contribution
This paper provides a detailed analysis of optimal survey parameters for space-based galaxy redshift surveys to maximize dark energy constraints, including new fitting formulae and the importance of growth rate information.
Findings
Including growth rate information improves the figure-of-merit by ~3x.
A survey covering ~20,000 deg^2 from z=0.5 to 2 is near optimal.
Space-based surveys uniquely access low redshift ranges and enable comprehensive 3D mapping.
Abstract
A space-based galaxy redshift survey would have enormous power in constraining dark energy and testing general relativity, provided that its parameters are suitably optimized. We study viable space-based galaxy redshift surveys, exploring the dependence of the Dark Energy Task Force (DETF) figure-of-merit (FoM) on redshift accuracy, redshift range, survey area, target selection, and forecast method. Fitting formulae are provided for convenience. We also consider the dependence on the information used: the full galaxy power spectrum P(k, P(k) marginalized over its shape, or just the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). We find that the inclusion of growth rate information (extracted using redshift space distortion and galaxy clustering amplitude measurements) leads to a factor of ~ 3 improvement in the FoM, assuming general relativity is not modified. This inclusion partially compensates…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
