Confronting Dark Energy Models using Galaxy Cluster Number Counts
S. Basilakos, M. Plionis, J. A. S. Lima

TL;DR
This study compares 12 dark energy models to the standard $\Lambda$CDM model using galaxy cluster counts and redshift distributions, identifying which models can be distinguished with future surveys.
Contribution
It introduces a method to differentiate dark energy models from $\Lambda$CDM$ using galaxy cluster surveys and provides a systematic analysis of their observational signatures.
Findings
8 out of 12 models can be distinguished from $\Lambda$CDM$ with future surveys.
4 models remain statistically indistinguishable from $\Lambda$CDM$.
The technique is competitive for testing dark energy effects.
Abstract
The mass function of cluster-size halos and their redshift distribution are computed for 12 distinct accelerating cosmological scenarios and confronted to the predictions of the conventional flat CDM model. The comparison with CDM is performed by a two-step process. Firstly, we determine the free parameters of all models through a joint analysis involving the latest cosmological data, using SNe type Ia, the CMB shift parameter and BAO. Apart from a brane world inspired cosmology, it is found that the derived Hubble relation of theremaining models reproduce the CDM results approximately with the same degree of statistical confidence. Secondly, in order to attempt distinguish the different dark energy models from the expectations of CDM, we analyze the predicted cluster-size halo redshift distribution on the basis of two future cluster surveys: (i) an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
