Apparent high metallicity in 3-4 keV galaxy clusters: the inverse iron-bias in action in the case of the merging cluster Abell 2028
F. Gastaldello (1,2), S. Ettori (3,4), I. Balestra (5), F. Brighenti, (6,7), D.A. Buote (2), S. De Grandi (8), S. Ghizzardi (1), M. Gitti (3,9), P., Tozzi (10) ((1) INAF-IASF Milano, (2) UC Irvine, (3) INAF-OA Bologna, (4), INFN Bologna, (5) MPE-Garching

TL;DR
This study investigates the apparent high iron abundance in 3-4 keV galaxy clusters, revealing that a bias in spectral fitting, known as the inverse iron bias, can artificially inflate metallicity measurements in complex, multi-temperature ICM structures.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates how the inverse iron bias affects metallicity estimates in galaxy clusters and emphasizes the importance of accounting for multi-temperature structures in spectral analysis.
Findings
The inverse iron bias causes overestimation of metallicity in single-component spectral fits.
Multi-temperature ICM structures lead to biased high metallicity measurements.
Correcting for the bias aligns metallicity values with those typical of hotter clusters.
Abstract
Recent work based on a global measurement of the ICM properties find evidence for an increase of the iron abundance in galaxy clusters with temperature around 2-4 keV up to a value about 3 times larger than that typical of very hot clusters. We have started a study of the metal distribution in these objects from the sample of Baumgartner et al. (2005), aiming at resolving spatially the metal content of the ICM. We report here on a 42ks XMM observation of the first object of the sample, the cluster Abell 2028. The XMM observation reveals a complex structure of the cluster over scale of 300 kpc, showing an interaction between two sub-clusters in cometary-like configurations. At the leading edges of the two substructures cold fronts have been detected. The core of the main subcluster is likely hosting a cool corona. We show that a one-component fit for this region returns a biased high…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
