Evidence of Possible Spin-Orbit Misalignment Along the Line of Sight in Transiting Exoplanet Systems
Kevin C. Schlaufman

TL;DR
This study combines observational data and a simple stellar rotation model to identify potential spin-orbit misalignments along the line of sight in transiting exoplanet systems, revealing a possible correlation with stellar mass and planetary characteristics.
Contribution
It introduces a statistical method to detect line-of-sight spin-orbit misalignments in exoplanet systems, supplementing existing sky-plane measurements and suggesting two distinct populations based on alignment.
Findings
Ten exoplanet systems likely have significant line-of-sight misalignment.
Misaligned systems tend to host more massive and eccentric planets.
Misalignment is more common around stars with masses between 1.2 and 1.5 solar masses.
Abstract
Of the 26 transiting exoplanet systems with measurements of the Rossiter-McLaughlin (RM) effect, eight have now been found to be significantly spin-orbit misaligned in the plane of the sky. Unfortunately, the RM effect only measures the angle between the orbit of a transiting exoplanet and the spin of its host star projected in the plane of sky, leaving unconstrained the compliment misalignment angle between the orbit of the planet and the spin of its host star along the line of sight. I use a simple model of stellar rotation benchmarked with observational data to statistically identify ten exoplanet systems from a sample of 75 for which there is likely a significant degree of misalignment along the line of sight between the orbit of the planet and the spin of its host star. I find that HAT-P-7, HAT-P-14, HAT-P-16, HD 17156, Kepler-5, Kepler-7, TrES-4, WASP-1, WASP-12, and WASP-14 are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
