Neutrino masses from clustering of red and blue galaxies: a test of astrophysical uncertainties
Molly E.C. Swanson, Will J. Percival, Ofer Lahav

TL;DR
This study tests the robustness of neutrino mass constraints derived from galaxy clustering and CMB data by analyzing red and blue galaxy populations separately, revealing consistency within current uncertainties but potential issues for future surveys.
Contribution
It introduces a method to empirically assess systematic uncertainties in neutrino mass estimates using separate galaxy color populations and compares results across different models and scales.
Findings
Red and blue galaxy power spectra yield consistent neutrino mass limits within uncertainties.
The difference in neutrino mass limits between galaxy types aligns with expected statistical variation.
Current data shows good agreement, but future surveys may face systematic challenges.
Abstract
Combining measurements of the galaxy power spectrum and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is a powerful means of constraining the summed mass of neutrino species sum(m_nu), but is subject to systematic uncertainties due to non-linear structure formation, redshift-space distortions and galaxy bias. We empirically test the robustness of neutrino mass results to these effects by separately analyzing power spectra of red and blue galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-II) Data Release 7 (DR7), combined with the CMB five-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP5) data. We consider fitting for a range of maximum wavenumber k using twelve different galaxy bias models. For example, using a new model based on perturbation theory and including redshift space distortions (Saito et al. 2009), the all-galaxy power spectrum combined with WMAP5 for a wavenumber range of k<0.2…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
