Exploring the randomness of Directed Acyclic Networks

TL;DR

This paper evaluates methods for randomizing directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to understand their structural randomness, applying these methods to both synthetic and real-world networks to assess how topological invariants influence network disorder.

Contribution

It introduces and compares four DAG randomization techniques based on different topological invariants, providing insights into their effects on network disorder analysis.

Findings

Real DAGs tend to be more ordered than random models when link direction is ignored.

Preserving link direction in randomization yields disorder measures close to null models.

Different invariants influence the interpretation of degree-degree relations in DAGs.

Abstract

The feed-forward relationship naturally observed in time-dependent processes and in a diverse number of real systems -such as some food-webs and electronic and neural wiring- can be described in terms of so-called directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). An important ingredient of the analysis of such networks is a proper comparison of their observed architecture against an ensemble of randomized graphs, thereby quantifying the {\em randomness} of the real systems with respect to suitable null models. This approximation is particularly relevant when the finite size and/or large connectivity of real systems make inadequate a comparison with the predictions obtained from the so-called {\em configuration model}. In this paper we analyze four methods of DAG randomization as defined by the desired combination of topological invariants (directed and undirected degree sequence and component distributions) aimed to be preserved. A highly ordered DAG, called \textit{snake}-graph and a Erd\:os-R\'enyi DAG were used to validate the performance of the algorithms. Finally, three real case studies, namely, the \textit{C. elegans} cell lineage network, a PhD student-advisor network and the Milgram's citation network were analyzed using each randomization method. Results show how the interpretation of degree-degree relations in DAGs respect to their randomized ensembles depend on the topological invariants imposed. In general, real DAGs provide disordered values, lower than the expected by chance when the directedness of the links is not preserved in the randomization process. Conversely, if the direction of the links is conserved throughout the randomization process, disorder indicators are close to the obtained from the null-model ensemble, although some deviations are observed.