Real-time Analysis and Selection Biases in the Supernova Legacy Survey
K. Perrett, D. Balam, M. Sullivan, C. Pritchet, A. Conley, R., Carlberg, P. Astier, C. Balland, S. Basa, D. Fouchez, J. Guy, D. Hardin, I., M. Hook, D. A. Howell, R. Pain, N. Regnault

TL;DR
This paper discusses the real-time detection and analysis of supernovae in the SNLS, highlighting observational biases like Malmquist bias, and presents methods to correct these biases for accurate cosmological measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of selection biases in SNLS and proposes correction methods to improve the reliability of supernova-based cosmology.
Findings
Biases become significant at z~0.6
Spectroscopic sample shifts towards brighter magnitudes at z>0.75
Bias correction methods reduce systematic uncertainties
Abstract
The Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) has produced a high-quality, homogeneous sample of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) out to redshifts greater than z=1. In its first four years of full operation (to June 2007), the SNLS discovered more than 3000 transient candidates, 373 of which have been confirmed spectroscopically as SNe Ia. Use of these SNe Ia in precision cosmology critically depends on an analysis of the observational biases incurred in the SNLS survey due to the incomplete sampling of the underlying SN Ia population. This paper describes our real-time supernova detection and analysis procedures, and uses detailed Monte Carlo simulations to examine the effects of Malmquist bias and spectroscopic sampling. Such sampling effects are found to become apparent at z~0.6, with a significant shift in the average magnitude of the spectroscopically confirmed SN Ia sample towards brighter values…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
