Integrality Gap of the Hypergraphic Relaxation of Steiner Trees: a short proof of a 1.55 upper bound
Deeparnab Chakrabarty, Jochen Koenemann, David Pritchard

TL;DR
This paper provides a shorter proof for the upper bound of 1.55 on the integrality gap of the hypergraphic relaxation used in Steiner tree approximations, enhancing understanding of this relaxation's effectiveness.
Contribution
It offers a concise proof of the 1.55 integrality gap bound by adapting techniques from a recent Steiner tree approximation algorithm.
Findings
Shorter proof of the 1.55 integrality gap bound
Application of randomized loss-contracting algorithm techniques
Improved understanding of hypergraph LP relaxation effectiveness
Abstract
Recently Byrka, Grandoni, Rothvoss and Sanita (at STOC 2010) gave a 1.39-approximation for the Steiner tree problem, using a hypergraph-based linear programming relaxation. They also upper-bounded its integrality gap by 1.55. We describe a shorter proof of the same integrality gap bound, by applying some of their techniques to a randomized loss-contracting algorithm.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Machine Learning and Algorithms
