K*0 production in Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at \sqrt{s_NN} = 62.4 GeV and 200 GeV
M.M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, A.V. Alakhverdyants, I. Alekseev, J., Alford, B.D. Anderson, Daniel Anson, D. Arkhipkin, G.S. Averichev, J., Balewski, L.S. Barnby, S. Baumgart, D.R. Beavis, R. Bellwied, M.J., Betancourt, R.R. Betts, A. Bhasin, A.K. Bhati, H. Bichsel, J. Bielcik, J.

TL;DR
This study measures K*0 meson production in Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at different energies, analyzing spectra, ratios, and flow to understand the hadronic medium effects and particle production mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of K*0 production and flow at RHIC energies, highlighting the dominance of re-scattering over regeneration in K*0 formation.
Findings
K*0 yields favor re-scattering over regeneration
Elliptic flow and RCP data support quark coalescence models
Energy and system size dependence of spectra and ratios
Abstract
We report on K*0 production at mid-rapidity in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 62.4 and 200 GeV collected by the Solenoid Tracker at RHIC (STAR) detector. The K*0 is reconstructed via the hadronic decays K*0 \to K+ pi- and \bar{K*0} \to K-pi+. Transverse momentum, pT, spectra are measured over a range of pT extending from 0.2 GeV/c to 5 GeV/c. The center of mass energy and system size dependence of the rapidity density, dN/dy, and the average transverse momentum, <pT>, are presented. The measured N(K*0)/N(K) and N(\phi)/N(K*0) ratios favor the dominance of re-scattering of decay daughters of K*0 over the hadronic regeneration for the K*0 production. In the intermediate pT region (2.0 < pT < 4.0 GeV/c), the elliptic flow parameter, v2, and the nuclear modification factor, RCP, agree with the expectations from the quark coalescence model of particle production.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
