Criteria for Flux Rope Eruption: Non Equilibrium versus Torus Instability
P. Demoulin, G. Aulanier

TL;DR
This paper compares different theoretical models of flux rope eruptions, showing that loss of equilibrium and torus instability are related, and identifies a critical decay index range for instability in coronal magnetic fields.
Contribution
It unifies various models of flux rope instability, demonstrating their underlying similarity and refining the critical decay index range for eruption onset.
Findings
Loss of equilibrium and torus instability are two views of the same mechanism.
Critical decay index for instability is approximately 1.1 to 1.3 for realistic current channels.
Unified analysis applies to both circular and straight current channels.
Abstract
The coronal magnetic configuration of an active region typically evolves quietly during few days before becoming suddenly eruptive and launching a coronal mass ejection (CME). The precise origin of the eruption is still debated. Among several mechanisms, it has been proposed that a loss of equilibrium, or an ideal magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) instability such as the torus instability, could be responsible for the sudden eruptivity. Distinct approaches have also been formulated for limit cases having circular or translation symmetry. We revisit the previous theoretical approaches, setting them in the same analytical framework. The coronal field results from the contribution of a non-neutralized current channel added to a background magnetic field, which in our model is the potential field generated by two photospheric flux concentrations. The evolution on short Alfvenic time scale is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
