Some Notes on the Difference between Interaction and Measurement

TL;DR

This paper advocates for an holistic approach to measurement, emphasizing the interconnectedness of all elements in an experiment and critiquing traditional subject/object boundaries, with a review of Everett's and Cramer's perspectives.

Contribution

It introduces a holistic perspective on measurement, challenging conventional boundaries and providing a logical basis for viewing experiments as entangled totalities.

Findings

Highlights flaws in Everett's and Cramer's positions

Proposes a boundary-eliminating holistic measurement approach

Encourages viewing experiments as interconnected totalities

Abstract

This paper has been withdrawn by the author. In this paper I present some reasons to adopt an holistic point of wiev, eliminating a boundary subject/object in the measurement. I review shortly Everett's and Cramer's positions, casting light on their flaws, to introduce a logical motivation to thinking to an experiment as a totality in which everything is entangled.