Remarks on Grothendieck's standard conjectures
Alexander Beilinson

TL;DR
This paper discusses how Grothendieck's standard conjectures are logically implied by two other conjectures in the realm of motives, connecting different foundational hypotheses in algebraic geometry.
Contribution
It establishes that Grothendieck's standard conjectures follow from the existence of a motivic t-structure or a weak form of Suslin's Lawson homology conjecture.
Findings
Grothendieck's conjectures are implied by the motivic t-structure conjecture.
Grothendieck's conjectures are implied by a weak form of Suslin's Lawson homology conjecture.
The paper links different motivic conjectures, suggesting a unified underlying framework.
Abstract
We show that Grothendieck's standard conjectures are implied by either of two other motivic conjectures: (a) by that of the existence of the motivic t-structure, and (b) by (a weak form of) Suslin's Lawson homology conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCommutative Algebra and Its Applications · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
