Comment on "A Non-Parametric Estimate of Mass 'Scoured' in Galaxy Cores" (arXiv:1006.0488)
Alister W. Graham

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous study on galaxy core mass estimates, clarifying that its main conclusions were already established and addressing concerns about the core-Sersic model's validity.
Contribution
It clarifies that the main conclusions of Hopkins & Hernquist's work were previously published and defends the core-Sersic model against recent criticisms.
Findings
Previous conclusions were already published six years ago.
The core-Sersic model remains valid for galaxy core analysis.
The critique addresses and refutes specific concerns about the model.
Abstract
This comment is in response to the article titled "A Non-Parametric Estimate of Mass Scoured in Galaxy Cores" (arXiv:1006.0488) written by Hopkins and Hernquist. This comment politely mentions two relevant papers in which the main conclusion from Hopkins & Hernquist had already been published six years ago using the core-Sersic model. It then explains why Hopkins & Hernquist's concern about the core-Sersic model is not valid.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
