Residual Hubble-bubble effects on supernova cosmology
Benjamin Sinclair, Tamara M. Davis, Troels Haugbolle

TL;DR
Local density fluctuations, such as Hubble-bubbles, can systematically bias supernova-based cosmological parameter estimates, and current analysis methods may not fully correct for these effects, impacting precision in dark energy measurements.
Contribution
This paper demonstrates that residual effects of local inhomogeneities persist in supernova cosmology analyses even after applying standard low-redshift cuts, highlighting the need for improved correction methods.
Findings
A local under-density of 30% causes a ~4% error in ΩΛ.
A low-redshift cutoff of z0 ~ 0.02 may be insufficient to eliminate bias.
Residual systematic shift of 0.99% in ΩΛ remains after standard corrections.
Abstract
Even in a universe that is homogeneous on large scales, local density fluctuations can imprint a systematic signature on the cosmological inferences we make from distant sources. One example is the effect of a local under-density on supernova cosmology. Also known as a Hubble-bubble, it has been suggested that a large enough under-density could account for the supernova magnitude- redshift relation without the need for dark energy or acceleration. Although the size and depth of under-density required for such an extreme result is extremely unlikely to be a random fluctuation in an on-average homogeneous universe, even a small under-density can leave residual effects on our cosmological inferences. In this paper we show that there remain systematic shifts in our cosmological parameter measure- ments, even after excluding local supernovae that are likely to be within any small…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
