Segmentation of Fault Networks Determined from Spatial Clustering of Earthquakes

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel clustering method for earthquake data that reconstructs fault networks by combining volume-based separation, probabilistic anisotropic kernels, and an EM algorithm, revealing detailed fault structures.

Contribution

The authors develop an innovative three-step clustering approach integrating volume analysis, anisotropic kernels, and cross-validation, advancing fault network reconstruction from seismic catalogs.

Findings

Faults cluster along planar patches of about 2 km$^2$

Clusters have a finite thickness of approximately 290 meters

Hypocenters exhibit a spatial fractal dimension of about 1.8

Abstract

We present a new method of data clustering applied to earthquake catalogs, with the goal of reconstructing the seismically active part of fault networks. We first use an original method to separate clustered events from uncorrelated seismicity using the distribution of volumes of tetrahedra defined by closest neighbor events in the original and randomized seismic catalogs. The spatial disorder of the complex geometry of fault networks is then taken into account by defining faults as probabilistic anisotropic kernels, whose structures are motivated by properties of discontinuous tectonic deformation and previous empirical observations of the geometry of faults and of earthquake clusters at many spatial and temporal scales. Combining this a priori knowledge with information theoretical arguments, we propose the Gaussian mixture approach implemented in an Expectation-Maximization (EM) procedure. A cross-validation scheme is then used and allows the determination of the number of kernels that should be used to provide an optimal data clustering of the catalog. This three-steps approach is applied to a high quality relocated catalog of the seismicity following the 1986 Mount Lewis ($M_l=5.7$) event in California and reveals that events cluster along planar patches of about 2 km$^2$, i.e. comparable to the size of the main event. The finite thickness of those clusters (about 290 m) suggests that events do not occur on well-defined euclidean fault core surfaces, but rather that the damage zone surrounding faults may be seismically active at depth. Finally, we propose a connection between our methodology and multi-scale spatial analysis, based on the derivation of spatial fractal dimension of about 1.8 for the set of hypocenters in the Mnt Lewis area, consistent with recent observations on relocated catalogs.