Differential influence of instruments in nuclear core activity evaluation by data assimilation
Bertrand Bouriquet, Jean-Philippe Argaud, Patrick Erhard, S\'ebastien, Massart, Ang\'elique Pon\c{c}ot, Sophie Ricci, Olivier Thual

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different instrument configurations affect the accuracy of nuclear core activity reconstructions using data assimilation, highlighting the importance of instrument placement and network design.
Contribution
It introduces a procedure to evaluate the influence of instruments in nuclear core activity assessment, considering various network configurations and instrument placements.
Findings
Instrument influence varies with location and network configuration.
Optimal instrument placement improves activity estimation accuracy.
Influence depends on both instrument independence and network structure.
Abstract
The global activity fields of a nuclear core can be reconstructed using data assimilation. Data assimilation allows to combine measurements from instruments, and information from a model, to evaluate the best possible activity within the core. We present and apply a specific procedure which evaluates this influence by adding or removing instruments in a given measurement network (possibly empty). The study of various network configurations of instruments in the nuclear core establishes that influence of the instruments depends both on the independant instrumentation location and on the chosen network.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
