Optically faint X-ray sources in the CDFN: Spitzer constraints
E. Rovilos, I. Georgantopoulos, A. Akylas, S. Fotopoulou

TL;DR
This study characterizes optically faint X-ray sources in GOODS-N, revealing they are mostly moderate-redshift, dust-obscured AGN or high-redshift QSOs, with implications for understanding the X-ray background and galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of optically faint X-ray sources using Spitzer data, identifying their nature and redshift distribution, and linking them to obscured AGN and high-redshift QSOs.
Findings
Majority are moderate-redshift, dust-obscured AGN or high-z QSOs.
Optically faint sources constitute over 50% of X-ray sources at z>2.
Their X-ray spectra are notably flatter than the X-ray background.
Abstract
We investigate the properties of the most optically faint sources in the GOODS-N area (R > 26.5 AB). Such extremely optically faint populations present an uncharted territory despite the fact that they represent an appreciable fraction of the X-ray sources in the GOODS-N field. They are believed to contain either red AGN at moderate redshifts or possibly QSO at very high redshift. We compile our sample by first finding the 3.6um IRAC counterparts of the X-ray sources and searching for the optical counterparts of the IRAC sources. 35 sources do not have counterparts in the R-band Subaru optical images. Of these, 18 have HST-ACS counterparts while the remaining have no optical counterparts. The vast majority of our 35 sources are classified as Extremely Red Objects (EROs) on the basis of their V-K lower limits. Their photometric redshifts show that these populate moderate redshifts…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
