Reply to the "Comment on 'Precise half-life values for two-neutrino double beta decay"
A.S. Barabash

TL;DR
This paper clarifies misunderstandings and defends the original conclusions of a previous work on double beta decay, emphasizing that criticisms were based on misreading or misunderstandings.
Contribution
It provides a rebuttal to criticisms of earlier research, reaffirming the original findings on half-life values for two-neutrino double beta decay.
Findings
Criticisms were based on misreading of prior work
Original conclusions on half-life values remain valid
Misunderstandings do not affect the original results
Abstract
It is demonstrated that remarks and criticism in work [1] (arXiv:1005.2436 nucl-th) have resulted from inattentive reading of work [2] (Phys. Rev.C 81, 035501 (2010)) or just some misunderstanding and do not influence conclusions of work [2].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeutrino Physics Research · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques
