\emph{In-situ} determination of astro-comb calibrator lines to better than 10 cm s$^{-1}$
C.-H. Li, A. Glenday, A. J. Benedick, G. Chang, L.-J. Chen, C. Cramer,, P. Fendel, G. Furesz, F. K\"artner, S. Korzennik, D. Phillips, D. Sasselov,, A. Szentgyorgyi, R. Walsworth

TL;DR
This paper presents an in-situ method to accurately determine and correct systematic spectral shifts in astro-comb calibrators caused by Fabry-Pérot cavity dispersion, enabling wavelength calibration better than 10 cm/s for high-precision astrophysical spectroscopy.
Contribution
The paper introduces a practical in-situ technique to measure and correct systematic shifts in astro-comb lines due to cavity dispersion, improving calibration accuracy for astrophysical spectrographs.
Findings
Achieved calibration accuracy better than 10 cm/s.
Demonstrated in-situ measurement of systematic spectral shifts.
Applicable at telescope-based spectrographs for improved RV detection.
Abstract
Improved wavelength calibrators for high-resolution astrophysical spectrographs will be essential for precision radial velocity (RV) detection of Earth-like exoplanets and direct observation of cosmological deceleration. The astro-comb is a combination of an octave-spanning femtosecond laser frequency comb and a Fabry-P\'erot cavity used to achieve calibrator line spacings that can be resolved by an astrophysical spectrograph. Systematic spectral shifts associated with the cavity can be 0.1-1 MHz, corresponding to RV errors of 10-100 cm/s, due to the dispersive properties of the cavity mirrors over broad spectral widths. Although these systematic shifts are very stable, their correction is crucial to high accuracy astrophysical spectroscopy. Here, we demonstrate an \emph{in-situ} technique to determine the systematic shifts of astro-comb lines due to finite Fabry-P\'erot cavity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
