Tiling Lattices with Sublattices, II
David Feldman, James Propp, Sinai Robins

TL;DR
This paper re-proves a theorem about tiling lattices with sublattices using generating functions and explores the limitations of constructing finite lattice tilings through subdivision processes.
Contribution
It provides a new proof of an existing theorem using generating functions and analyzes the constraints of building tilings via subdivision.
Findings
Re-proved the theorem using generating functions.
Not all finite lattice tilings can be generated by subdivision.
Identified limitations in tiling constructions.
Abstract
Our earlier article proved that if translates of sublattices of tile , and all the sublattices are Cartesian products of arithmetic progressions, then two of the tiles must be translates of each other. We re-prove this Theorem, this time using generating functions. We also show that for , not every finite tiling of by lattices can be obtained from the trivial tiling by the process of repeatedly subdividing a tile into sub-tiles that are translates of one another.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCellular Automata and Applications · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties · semigroups and automata theory
