P-matrices and signed digraphs
Murad Banaji, Carrie Rutherford

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between signed digraphs and matrix products, showing how cycle parity in the graph influences the positivity properties of the resulting matrices, extending previous graph-matrix theory results.
Contribution
It establishes a novel link between cycle parity in signed digraphs and the P0-matrix property of matrix products, generalizing earlier findings.
Findings
Absence of e-cycles implies the matrix product is P0
Presence of e-cycle can produce a non-P0 matrix product
Generalizes previous graph-matrix relationship results
Abstract
We associate a signed digraph with a list of matrices whose dimensions permit them to be multiplied, and whose product is square. Cycles in this graph have a parity, that is, they are either even (termed e-cycles) or odd (termed o-cycles). The absence of e-cycles in the graph is shown to imply that the matrix product is a P0-matrix, i.e., all of its principal minors are nonnegative. Conversely, the presence of an e-cycle is shown to imply that there exists a list of matrices associated with the graph whose product fails to be a P0-matrix. The results generalise a number of previous results relating P- and P0-matrices to graphs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsgraph theory and CDMA systems · Graph theory and applications · Advanced Graph Theory Research
