The Civ line width distribution for quasars and its implications for broad-line region dynamics and virial mass estimation
S. Fine, S. M. Croom, J. Bland-Hawthorn, K. A. Pimbblet, N. P. Ross,, D. P. Schneider, T. Shanks

TL;DR
This study analyzes the distribution of Civ line widths in quasars, compares fitting methods, and explores implications for black hole mass estimation, revealing inconsistencies and the limited utility of line widths in virial mass calculations.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new line fitting procedure for Civ lines and compares its results across large surveys, highlighting systematic differences and implications for virial mass estimators.
Findings
Civ lines tend to be broader than Mgii lines in spectra with both.
Weak correlation between Civ and Mgii line widths, with significant scatter.
Dispersion in Civ line widths is independent of redshift and luminosity.
Abstract
We perform an extensive analysis of the Civ line in three large spectroscopic surveys of quasars. Differing approaches for fitting the Civ line can be found in the literature, and we compare the most common methods to highlight the relative systematics associated with each. We develop a line fitting procedure and apply it to the Civ line in spectra from the SDSS, 2QZ and 2SLAQ surveys. Our results are compared with a previous study of the Mgii line in the same sample. Civ tends to be broader than the Mgii line in spectra that have both, and the average ratio between the lines is consistent with a simplistic model for a photoionised, virialised and stratified broad-line region. There is a statistically significant correlation between the widths of the Civ and Mgii lines. However, the correlation is weak, and the scatter around a best fit is only marginally less than the full dynamic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
