Stripe order in superconducting La(2-x)Ba(x)CuO(4) for 0.095 <= x <= 0.155

TL;DR

This study investigates the relationship between stripe order, superconductivity, and crystal structure in La(2-x)Ba(x)CuO(4), revealing that charge stripe order coexists with superconductivity near x=1/8 and is influenced by structural phase transitions.

Contribution

It provides detailed phase diagrams and insights into how stripe orders interact with superconductivity and structural phases across a range of doping levels in La(2-x)Ba(x)CuO(4).

Findings

Charge stripe order coexists with bulk superconductivity near x=1/8.

Charge order parameter decreases quickly away from x=1/8.

Spin stripe order is most pronounced at x=1/8 and coincides with charge order.

Abstract

The correlations between stripe order, superconductivity, and crystal structure in La(2-x)Ba(x)CuO(4) single crystals have been studied by means of x-ray and neutron diffraction as well as static magnetization measurements. The derived phase diagram shows that charge stripe order (CO) coexists with bulk superconductivity in a broad range of doping around x=1/8, although the CO order parameter falls off quickly for x<>1/8. Except for x=0.155, the onset of CO always coincides with the transition between the orthorhombic and the tetragonal low temperature structures. The CO transition evolves from a sharp drop at low x to a more gradual transition at higher x, eventually falling below the structural phase boundary for optimum doping. With respect to the interlayer CO correlations, we find no qualitative change of the stripe stacking order as a function of doping, and in-plane and out-of-plane correlations disappear simultaneously at the transition. Similarly to the CO, the spin stripe order (SO) is also most pronounced at x=1/8. Truly static SO sets in below the CO and coincides with the first appearance of in-plane superconducting correlations at temperatures significantly above the bulk transition to superconductivity (SC). Indications that bulk SC causes a reduction of the spin or charge stripe order could not be identified. We argue that CO is the dominant order that is compatible with SC pairing but competes with SC phase coherence. Comparing our results with data from the literature, we find good agreement if all results are plotted as a function of x' instead of the nominal x, where x' represents an estimate of the actual Ba content, extracted from the doping dependence of the structural transition between the orthorhombic phase and the tetragonal high-temperature phase.