High redshift Lya emitters: clues on the Milky Way infancy
S. Salvadori (1), P. Dayal (2), A. Ferrara (3) ((1) Kapteyn, Astronomical Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands (2) SISSA/ISAS, Trieste,, Italy (3) Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy)

TL;DR
This study investigates whether Milky Way progenitors at high redshift could be observed as Lyman Alpha Emitters (LAEs), analyzing their properties and the likelihood of detection, and linking early galaxy formation to present-day stellar populations.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed modeling of MW progenitors as high-z LAEs, including their luminosity, equivalent width, and the probability of detection, connecting early galaxy properties to local universe observations.
Findings
Some MW progenitors meet LAE criteria at z ~ 5.7.
High probability (68%) of detecting at least one LAE progenitor.
LAE progenitors contribute significantly to very metal-poor stars in the halo.
Abstract
With the aim of determining if Milky Way (MW) progenitors could be identified as high redshift Lyman Alpha Emitters (LAEs) we have derived the intrinsic properties of z ~ 5.7 MW progenitors, which are then used to compute their observed Lyman-alpha luminosity, L_alpha, and equivalent width, EW. MW progenitors visible as LAEs are selected according to the canonical observational criterion, L_alpha > 10^42 erg/s and EW > 20 A. Progenitors of MW-like galaxies have L_alpha = 10^(39-43.25) erg/s, making some of them visible as LAEs. In any single MW merger tree realization, typically only 1 (out of ~ 50) progenitor meets the LAE selection criterion, but the probability to have at least one LAE is very high, P = 68%. The identified LAE stars have ages, t_* ~ 150-400 Myr at z ~ 5.7 with the exception of five small progenitors with t_* < 5 Myr and large EW = 60-130 A. LAE MW progenitors provide…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
