Isospectral But Physically Distinct: Modular Symmetries and their Implications for Carbon Nanotori
Keith R. Dienes, Brooks Thomas

TL;DR
This paper reveals that many physically different carbon nanotori share identical electronic spectra due to modular symmetries, significantly reducing the number of spectrally distinct nanotori and impacting their predicted electronic properties.
Contribution
The study uncovers modular symmetries in carbon nanotori that cause spectral equivalences, challenging previous assumptions and extending to cases with magnetic flux.
Findings
Many distinct nanotori have identical band structures due to modular symmetries.
The number of spectrally distinct nanotori is much smaller than the total number of physical configurations.
The fraction of metallic nanotori is approximately three times higher than previously estimated.
Abstract
Recently there has been considerable interest in the properties of carbon nanotori. Such nanotori can be parametrized according to their radii, their chiralities, and the twists that occur upon joining opposite ends of the nanotubes from which they are derived. In this paper, however, we demonstrate that many physically distinct nanotori with wildly different parameters nevertheless share identical band structures, energy spectra, and electrical conductivities. This occurs as a result of certain geometric symmetries known as modular symmetries which are direct consequences of the properties of the compactified graphene sheet. Using these symmetries, we show that there is a dramatic reduction in the number of spectrally distinct carbon nanotori compared with the number of physically distinct carbon nanotori. The existence of these modular symmetries also allows us to demonstrate that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
