Coordinated and Uncoordinated Optimization of Networks
Markus Brede

TL;DR
This paper explores how spatial networks can be optimized globally or locally to balance infrastructure costs and communication efficiency, revealing distinct network structures and power-law link distributions depending on the optimization process and spatial dimension.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of globally and locally optimized spatial networks, identifying phase transitions and hierarchical structures in different regimes.
Findings
Global optimization yields small worlds, star-like, and hub-centered trees.
Power-law link length distributions emerge in high-cost regimes.
Local optimization shows dimension-dependent phase transitions and hierarchical structures.
Abstract
In this paper we consider spatial networks that realize a balance between an infrastructure cost (the cost of wire needed to connect the network in space) and communication efficiency, measured by average shortest pathlength. A global optimization procedure yields network topologies in which this balance is optimized. These are compared with network topologies generated by a competitive process in which each node strives to optimize its own cost-communication balance. Three phases are observed in globally optimal configurations for different cost-communication trade-offs: (i) regular small worlds, (ii) star-like networks and (iii) trees with a centre of interconnected hubs. In the latter regime, i.e. for very expensive wire, power laws in the link length distributions are found, which can be explained by a hierarchical organization of the networks. In contrast,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
