Matching post-Newtonian and numerical relativity waveforms: systematic errors and a new phenomenological model for non-precessing black hole binaries
L. Santamaria, F. Ohme, P. Ajith, B. Bruegmann, N. Dorband, M. Hannam,, S. Husa, P. Moesta, D. Pollney, C. Reisswig, E. L. Robinson, J. Seiler, B., Krishnan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new phenomenological gravitational waveform model for non-precessing black hole binaries, combining post-Newtonian and numerical relativity data, and addresses systematic errors in waveform matching.
Contribution
It develops a frequency domain matching method and provides an analytical formula for the dominant gravitational wave mode, enhancing gravitational wave detection accuracy.
Findings
Dominant error source identified as post-Newtonian waveform inaccuracies near merger.
Analytical formula effectively captures hybrid waveform phenomenology.
Implementation improves gravitational wave search sensitivity.
Abstract
We present a new phenomenological gravitational waveform model for the inspiral and coalescence of non-precessing spinning black hole binaries. Our approach is based on a frequency domain matching of post-Newtonian inspiral waveforms with numerical relativity based binary black hole coalescence waveforms. We quantify the various possible sources of systematic errors that arise in matching post-Newtonian and numerical relativity waveforms, and we use a matching criteria based on minimizing these errors; we find that the dominant source of errors are those in the post-Newtonian waveforms near the merger. An analytical formula for the dominant mode of the gravitational radiation of non-precessing black hole binaries is presented that captures the phenomenology of the hybrid waveforms. Its implementation in the current searches for gravitational waves should allow cross-checks of other…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
