The HST/ACS Coma Cluster Survey. II. Data Description and Source Catalogs
Derek Hammer, Gijs Verdoes Kleijn, Carlos Hoyos, Mark den Brok, Marc, Balcells, Henry C. Ferguson, Paul Goudfrooij, David Carter, Rafael Guzman,, Reynier F. Peletier, Russell J. Smith, Alister W. Graham, Neil Trentham, Eric, Peng, Thomas H. Puzia, John R. Lucey, Shardha Jogee

TL;DR
This paper presents the data, methodology, and source catalogs from the HST/ACS Coma Cluster Survey, including object detection, photometry, and analysis of galaxy populations, despite the survey being partially completed due to instrument failure.
Contribution
It provides detailed reprocessed images, source catalogs, and assessment methods for a large HST survey of the Coma cluster, including photometric accuracy and galaxy population analysis.
Findings
Approximately 73,000 objects detected, with half brighter than F814W=25.8 mag
Majority of objects are unresolved or marginally resolved, including GCs and UCDs
The red sequence of Coma galaxies is consistent across 9 magnitudes
Abstract
The Coma cluster was the target of a HST-ACS Treasury program designed for deep imaging in the F475W and F814W passbands. Although our survey was interrupted by the ACS instrument failure in 2007, the partially completed survey still covers ~50% of the core high-density region in Coma. Observations were performed for 25 fields that extend over a wide range of cluster-centric radii (~1.75 Mpc) with a total coverage area of 274 arcmin^2. The majority of the fields are located near the core region of Coma (19/25 pointings) with six additional fields in the south-west region of the cluster. In this paper we present reprocessed images and SExtractor source catalogs for our survey fields, including a detailed description of the methodology used for object detection and photometry, the subtraction of bright galaxies to measure faint underlying objects, and the use of simulations to assess the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
