On the spectro-photometric properties of the bulk of the radio-loud AGN population
Ranieri D. Baldi (1), Alessandro Capetti (2) ((1) SISSA, Trieste,, Italy (2) INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino, Italy)

TL;DR
This study explores the properties of low radio power, radio-loud AGN, revealing that most are Low Excitation Galaxies hosted by massive, early-type galaxies, with radio emission deficits likely due to evolutionary effects rather than host differences.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the photometric and spectroscopic properties of low-power radio-loud AGN, highlighting their host galaxy characteristics and potential evolutionary factors affecting radio luminosity.
Findings
Most low-power radio-loud AGN are Low Excitation Galaxies.
Hosts are massive, early-type galaxies with large black holes.
Radio emission deficit may be due to temporal evolution, not host properties.
Abstract
In a previous paper we showed that the radio sources selected by combining large areas radio and optical surveys, present a strong deficit of radio emission with respect to 3CR radio-galaxies matched in line emission luminosity. We argued that the prevalence of sources with luminous extended radio structures in high flux limited samples is due to a selection bias. Sources with low radio power form the bulk of the radio-loud AGN population but are still virtually unexplored. We here analyze their photometric and spectroscopic properties. From the point of view of their emission lines, the majority of the sample are Low Excitation Galaxies (LEG), similar to the 3CR objects at the same level of line luminosity. The hosts of LEG are red, massive Early-Type Galaxies (ETG) with large black holes masses , statistically indistinguishable from the hosts of low redshift 3CR/LEG sources. No…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
