Some critical remarks on Landau's (macroscopic) phase transitions theory
Giuseppe Iurato

TL;DR
This paper critically examines Landau's phase transition theory by analyzing a formal model from astrophysics, revealing discrepancies with certain criteria and suggesting Landau's phenomenological approach is more restrictive.
Contribution
It introduces a formal astrophysical model that challenges aspects of Landau's phenomenological theory of phase transitions.
Findings
The model exhibits a second order phase transition.
It violates the Birman-Goldrich-Jaric chain subduction criterion.
It does not satisfy Ascher's maximality criterion.
Abstract
This paper explain the existence of a particular formal model (drew from Theoretical Astrophysics) whose thermodynamical phenomenology shows a possible second order phase transition (according to Landau's Thermodynamical Theory) that seems does not verify the (Birman-Goldrich-Jaric) "chain subduction criterion" and the (Ascher's) "maximality criterion" of Landau's Phenomenological Theory. Therefore, it follows that Landau's Phenomenological Theory is more restrictive than the Landau's Thermodynamical Theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Mechanics and Entropy · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Graph theory and applications
